For a hands-on learning experience to develop LLM applications, join our LLM Bootcamp today.
First 5 seats get a 30% discount! So hurry up!

agentic ai

It is easy to forget how much our devices do for us until your smart assistant dims the lights, adjusts the thermostat, and reminds you to drink water, all on its own. That seamless experience is not just about convenience, but a glimpse into the growing world of agentic AI.

Whether it is a self-driving car navigating rush hour or a warehouse robot dodging obstacles while organizing inventory, agentic AI is quietly revolutionizing how things get done. It is moving us beyond automation into a world where machines can think, plan, and act more like humans, only faster and with fewer coffee breaks.

In today’s fast-moving tech world, understanding agentic AI is not just for the experts. It is already shaping industries like healthcare, finance, logistics, and beyond. In this blog, we will break down what agentic AI is, how it works, where it’s being used, and what it means for the future. Ready to explore more? Let’s dive in.

 

LLM bootcamp banner

 

What is Agentic AI?

Agentic AI is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that does not just follow rules but acts like an intelligent agent. These systems are designed to make their own decisions, set and pursue goals, and adapt to changes in real time. In short, they are built to chase goals, solve problems, and interact with their environment with minimal human input.

So, what makes agentic AI different from general AI?

General AI usually refers to systems that can perform specific tasks well, like answering questions, recommending content, or recognizing images. These systems are often reactive as they respond based on what they have been programmed or trained to do. While powerful, they typically rely on human instructions for every step.

Agentic AI, on the other hand, is built to act autonomously. This means it can make decisions without needing constant human direction. It can explore, learn from outcomes, and improve its performance over time. It does not just follow commands, but figures out how to reach a goal and adapts if things change along the way.

 

You can also learn about Explainable AI (XAI)

 

Key Characteristics of Agentic AI

Here are some of the core features that define agentic AI:

  • Autonomy – Agentic AI can operate independently. Once given a goal, it decides what steps to take without relying on human input at every turn.
  • Goal-Oriented Behavior –These systems are built to achieve specific outcomes. Whether it is automating a reply to emails or optimizing a process, agentic AI keeps its focus on the end goal.
  • Learning and Adaptation – Through experience and feedback, the agent learns what works and what does not. Over time, it adjusts its actions to perform better in changing conditions.
  • Interactivity – Agentic AI interacts with its environment, and sometimes with other agents. It takes in data, makes sense of it, and uses that information to plan its next move.

Hence, agentic AI represents a shift from passive machine intelligence to proactive, adaptive systems. It’s about creating AI that does not just do, but thinks, learns, and acts on its own.

 

Who Can Use Agentic AI? - Exploring What is Agentic AI?

 

Why Do We Need Agentic AI?

As industries grow more complex and fast-paced, the demand for intelligent systems that can think, decide, and act independently is rising. Let’s explore why agentic AI matters and how it’s helping businesses and organizations operate smarter and safer.

1. Automation of Complex Tasks

Some tasks are just too complicated or too dynamic for traditional automation. Such as autonomous driving, warehouse robotics, or financial strategy planning. These are situations where conditions are always changing, and quick decisions are needed.

Agentic AI can handle this kind of complexity as it can make split-second choices, adjust its behavior in real time, and learn from new situations. For enterprises, this means less need for constant human monitoring and faster responses to changing scenarios, saving both time and resources.

2. Scalability Across Industries

As businesses grow, so does the challenge of scaling operations. Hiring more people is not always practical or cost-effective, especially in areas like logistics, healthcare, and customer service. Agentic AI provides a scalable solution.

Once trained, AI agents can operate across multiple systems or locations simultaneously. For example, a single AI agent can monitor thousands of network endpoints or manage customer service chats around the world. This drastically reduces the need for human labor and increases productivity without sacrificing quality.

3. Efficiency and Accuracy

Humans are great at creative thinking but not always at repetitive, detail-heavy tasks. However, agentic AI can process large amounts of data quickly and act with high precision, reducing errors that might happen due to fatigue or oversight.

In industries like manufacturing or healthcare, even small mistakes can be costly. Agentic AI brings consistency and speed, helping businesses deliver better results, faster, and at scale.

4. Reducing Human Error and Bias

Unconscious bias can sneak into human decisions, whether it’s in hiring, lending, or law enforcement. While AI isn’t inherently unbiased, agentic AI can be trained and monitored to operate with fairness and transparency.

By basing decisions on data and algorithms rather than gut feelings, businesses can reduce the influence of bias in critical systems. That’s especially important for organizations looking to promote fairness, comply with regulations, and build trust with customers.

5. 24/7 Operations

Unlike humans, agentic AI does not need sleep, breaks, or time off. It can work around the clock, making it ideal for mission-critical systems that need constant oversight, like cybersecurity, infrastructure monitoring, or global customer support.

Enterprises benefit hugely from this 24/7 operations capability. It means faster responses, less downtime, and more consistent service without adding shifts or extra personnel.

6. Risk Reduction in Dangerous Environments

Some environments are too risky for people. Whether exploring the deep sea, handling toxic chemicals, or responding to natural disasters, agentic AI can take over where human safety is at risk.

For companies operating in high-risk industries like mining, oil & gas, or emergency services, agentic AI offers a safer and more reliable alternative. It protects human lives and ensures that critical tasks continue even in the toughest conditions.

 

How generative AI and LLMs work

 

Thus, agentic AI is a strategic advantage that helps organizations become more resilient and responsive. By taking on the tasks that are too complex, repetitive, or risky for humans, agentic systems are becoming essential tools in the modern enterprise toolkit.

Agentic Frameworks: The Backbone of Smarter AI Agents

As we move toward more autonomous, goal-driven AI systems, agentic frameworks are becoming essential. These frameworks are the building blocks that help developers create, manage, and coordinate intelligent agents that can plan, reason, and act with little to no human input.

Some key features of agentic frameworks include:

  • Autonomy: Agents can operate independently, choosing their next move based on goals and context.
  • Tool Integration: Many frameworks let agents use APIs, databases, search engines, or other services to complete tasks
  • Memory & State: Agents can remember previous steps, conversations, or actions – crucial for long-term tasks
  • Reasoning & Planning: They can decide how to best tackle a goal, often using logical steps or pre-built workflows
  • Multi-Agent Collaboration: Some frameworks allow teams of agents to work together, each playing a different role

 

Multi-Agent System Frameworks - what is agentic ai

 

Let’s take a quick tour of some popular agentic frameworks being used:

Absolutely! Here’s a more concise and conversational version of the content:

AutoGen (by Microsoft)

AutoGen is a powerful framework developed by Microsoft that focuses on multi-agent collaboration. It allows developers to easily create and manage systems where multiple AI agents can communicate, share information, and delegate tasks to each other.

These agents can be configured with specific roles and behaviors, enabling dynamic workflows. AutoGen makes the coordination between these agents seamless, using dialogue loops and tool integrations to keep things on track. It’s especially useful for building autonomous systems that need to complete complex, multi-step tasks efficiently.

LangGraph

LangGraph allows you to build agent workflows using a graph-based architecture. Each node is a decision point or a task, and the edges define how data and control flow between them. This structure allows you to build custom agent paths while maintaining a clear and manageable logic.

It is ideal for scenarios where agents need to follow a structured process with some flexibility to adapt based on inputs or outcomes. For example, if you’re building a support system, one branch of the graph might handle technical issues, while another might escalate billing concerns. This brings clarity, control, and customizability to agent workflows.

 

You can also read and explore LangChain

 

CrewAI

CrewAI allows you to build a “crew” of AI agents, each with defined roles, goals, and responsibilities. One agent might act as a project manager, another as a developer, and another as a marketer. The magic of CrewAI lies in how these agents collaborate, communicate, and coordinate to achieve shared objectives.

It stands out due to its role-based reasoning system, where each agent has a clear purpose and autonomy to perform their part. This makes it perfect for building collaborative agent systems for content generation, research workflows, or even code development. It is a great way to simulate real-world team dynamics, but with AI.

Thus, if you are looking to build your own AI agent, agentic frameworks are where you want to start. Each of these tools makes Agentic AI smarter, safer, and more capable. The right framework can make a difference between a basic bot and a truly intelligent agent.

Steps to Design an Agentic AI

Designing an Agentic AI is like building a smart, independent worker that can think for itself, adapt, and act without constant instructions. However, the process is more complex than writing a few lines of code.

 

Steps to Designing an Agentic AI

 

Below are the key steps you need to follow to design an agentic system:

Step 1: Define the Agent’s Purpose and Goals

The process starts with a simple question: What is your agent supposed to do? It could be about navigating a delivery drone through traffic, managing customer queries, or optimizing warehouse operations. Whatever the task, you need to be clear about the outcome you’re aiming for.

When defining goals, you must make sure that those are specific and measurable, like reducing delivery time by 20% or increasing customer response accuracy to 95%. These well-defined goals will ensure that your agent is focused and helps you evaluate how well it is performing over time.

Step 2: Develop the Perception System

In the next step, you must see and understand the environment of your agent. Depending on the use case, this could involve input from cameras, sensors, microphones, or live data streams like weather updates or stock prices.

However, raw data is not helpful on its own. The agent needs to process and extract meaningful features from it. This might mean identifying objects in an image, picking out keywords from audio, or interpreting sensor readings. This layer of perception is the foundation for everything the agent does next.

Step 3: Build the Decision-Making Framework

Now is the time for the agent to think for itself. You will need to implement algorithms that let it choose actions on its own. Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a popular choice because it mimics how humans learn: by trial and error.

Planning methods like POMDPs (Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes) or Hierarchical Task Networks (HTNs) can also help the agent make smart choices, especially when the environment is complex or unpredictable.

You must also ensure a balance between exploration (trying new things) and exploitation (sticking with what works). Too much of either can hold the agent back.

Step 4: Create the Learning Mechanism

Learning is an essential aspect of an agentic AI system. To implement this, you need to integrate learning systems into the agent so it can adapt to new situations. With RL, the agent receives rewards (or penalties) based on the decisions it makes, helping it understand what leads to success.

You can also use supervised learning if you already have labeled data to teach the agent. Either way, the key is to set up strong feedback loops so the agent can improve continuously. Think of it like training your agent until it can train itself.

Step 5: Incorporate Safety and Ethical Constraints

Now comes the important part: making sure the agent behaves responsibly and within ethical boundaries. Especially if your AI decisions can impact people’s lives, like recommending loans, hiring candidates, or driving a car. You need to ensure your agentic AI works with safety and ethical checks in place right from the start.

You can use tools like constraint-based learning, reward shaping, or safe exploration methods to make sure your agent does not make risky or unfair decisions. You should also consider fairness, transparency, and accountability to align your agent with human values.

Step 6: Test and Simulate

Now that your agent is ready, it is time to give it a test run. Simulated environments like Unity ML-Agents, CARLA (for driving), or Gazebo (for robotics) allow you to model real-world conditions in a safe, controlled way.

It is like a practice field for your AI where it can make mistakes, learn from them, and try again. You must expose your agent to different scenarios, edge cases, and unexpected challenges to ensure it adapts and not just memorizes patterns. The better you test your agentic AI, the more reliable your agent will be in application.

Step 7: Monitor and Improve

Once you have tested your agent and you make it go live, the next step is to monitor its real-world performance and improve where possible. It is an iterative process where you must set up systems to monitor how it is doing in real-time.

Continuous learning lets the agent evolve with new data and feedback. You might need to tweak its reward signals, update its learning model, or fine-tune its goals. Think of this as maintenance and growth rolled into one. The goal is to have an agent that not only works well today but gets even smarter tomorrow.

This entire process is about responsibility, adaptability, and purpose. Whether you are building a helpful assistant or a mission-critical system, following these steps can help you create an AI that acts with autonomy and accountability.

Key Challenges in Agentic AI

Building systems that can think and act on their own comes with serious challenges. With autonomy of agentic AI systems comes complexity, uncertainty, and responsibility.

 

challenges and key considerations of agentic AI

 

Let’s break down some of the major hurdles you can face when designing and deploying agentic AI.

Autonomy vs. Control

One of the biggest challenges is finding the right balance between giving an agent the freedom to make decisions and maintaining enough control to guide it safely. With too much freedom, AI might act in unexpected or risky ways. On the other hand, too much control stops it from being truly autonomous.

For instance, a warehouse robot needs to change its route to avoid obstacles. This requires the robot to function autonomously, but if safety checks are skipped, it can lead to trouble in maintaining the operations. Thus, you must consider smart ways to allow autonomy while still keeping humans in the loop when needed.

Bias and Ethical Concerns

AI systems learn from data, which can be biased. If an agent is trained on flawed or biased data, it may make unfair or even harmful decisions. An agentic AI making biased decisions can lead to real-world harm.

Unlike traditional software, these agents learn and evolve, making it harder to spot and fix ethical issues after the fact. It is crucial to build transparency and fairness into the system from the start.

Generalization and Robustness

Real-world environments are messy and unpredictable. Hence, agentic AI needs to handle new situations it was not explicitly trained on earlier. For instance, a home assistant is trained in a clean, well-lit house.

What happens when it is placed in a cluttered apartment or has to work during a power outage? To ensure smooth processing, agents need to be designed in a way that they can generalize and stay stable across diverse environments. It is key to making them truly reliable.

Accountability and Responsibility

Accountability is a crucial challenge in agentic AI. What if something goes wrong? Who to blame? The developer, the company, or the AI itself? This is a big legal and ethical gray area.

If an autonomous vehicle causes an accident or an AI advisor gives poor financial advice, there needs to be a clear line of responsibility. As agentic AI becomes more widespread, we need frameworks to address accountability in a fair and consistent way.

Safety and Security

Agentic AI has the potential to act in ways developers never intended. This opens up a whole new bunch of safety issues, ranging from self-driving cars making unsafe maneuvers to chatbots generating harmful content.

Moreover, there is the threat of adversarial attacks tricking the AI systems into malfunctioning. To avoid such instances, it is important to build robust safety mechanisms and ensure secure operation before rolling these systems out widely.

Aligning AI Goals with Human Values

This is actually more complex than it may seem. Ensuring that your agentic AI can understand and follow human goals is not a simple task. It can easily be considered one of the hardest challenges of agentic AI.

This alignment must be technical, moral, and social to ensure the agent operates accurately and ethically. An AI agent might figure out how to hit a target metric, but in ways that are not in our best interest. Like optimizing for screen time by promoting unhealthy habits.

To overcome this challenge, you must work on your agent to ensure proper alignment of its goals with human values. True alignment means teaching AI not just what to do, but also the why, while ensuring its goals evolve with human beings.

Tackling these challenges head-on is the only way to build systems we can trust and rely on in the real world. The more we invest in safety, ethics, and alignment today, the brighter and more beneficial the future of agentic AI will be.

The Future Is Autonomous – Are You Ready for It?

Agentic AI is here, quietly changing the way we live and work. Whether it is a smart assistant adjusting your lights or a fleet of robots managing warehouse inventory, these systems are doing more than just following rules. They are learning, adapting, and making real decisions on their own.

And let’s be honest, this shift is exciting and a little daunting. Giving machines the power to think and act means we need to rethink how we build, manage, and trust them. From safety and ethics to alignment and accountability, there is a lot to get right.

But that is also what makes this such an important moment. The tools, the frameworks, and the knowledge are all evolving fast, and there is never been a better time to be part of the conversation.

If you are curious about where all this is headed, make sure to check out the Rise of Agentic AI Conference by Data Science Dojo, happening on May 27 and 28, 2025. It brings together AI experts, innovators, and curious minds like yours to explore what is next in autonomous systems.

Agentic AI is shaping the future. The question is – will you be leading the charge or catching up? Let’s find out together.

Future of Data and AI - Rise of Agentic AI Conference

April 25, 2025

Did science fiction just quietly become our everyday tech reality? Because just a few years ago, the idea of machines that think, plan, and act like humans felt like something straight from the pages of Asimov or a scene from Westworld. This used to be futuristic fiction!

However, with AI agents, this advanced machine intelligence is slowly turning into a reality. These AI agents use memory, make decisions, switch roles, and even collaborate with other agents to get things done.

But here’s the twist: as these agents become more capable, evaluating them has become much harder.

Traditional LLM evaluation metrics do not capture the nuance of an agent’s behavior or reasoning path. We need new ways to trace, debug, and measure performance, because building smarter agents means understanding them at a much deeper level.

The answer to this dilemma is Arize AI, the team leading the charge on ML observability and evaluation in production. Known for their open-source tool Arize Phoenix, they are helping AI teams unlock visibility into how their agents really work, spotting breakdowns, tracing decision-making, and refining agent behavior in real time.

 

Evaluating AI Agents with Arize AI

 

To help understand this fast-moving space, we have partnered with Arize AI on a special three-part community series focused on evaluating AI agents. In this blog, we will walk you through the highlights of the series that focuses on real-world examples, hands-on demos using Arize Pheonix, and practical techniques to build your AI agents.

Let’s dive in.

Part 1: What is an AI Agent?

The series starts off with an introduction to AI agents – systems that can take actions to achieve specific goals. It does not just generate text or predictions, but interacts with its environment, makes decisions, uses tools, and adjusts its behavior based on what is happening around it.

Thus, while most AI models are passive – relying on a prompt to generate a response, agents are active. They are built to think a few steps ahead, handle multiple tasks, and work toward an outcome. This is the key difference between an AI model and an agent. One answers a question, and the other figures out how to solve a problem.

For an AI agent to function like a goal-oriented system, it needs more than just a language model. It needs structure and components that allow it to remember, think ahead, interact with tools, and sometimes even work as part of a team.

 

How generative AI and LLMs work

 

Its key building blocks include:

  • Memory

It allows agents to remember what has happened so far, like previous steps, conversations, or tool outputs. This is crucial for maintaining context across a multi-step process. For example, if an agent is helping you plan a trip, it needs to recall your budget, destination preferences, and dates from earlier in the conversation.

Some agents use short-term memory that lasts only during a single session, while others have long-term memory that lets them learn from past experiences over time. Without this, agents would start from scratch every time they are asked for help.

  • Planning

Planning enables an agent to take a big, messy goal and break it down into clear, achievable steps. For instance, if you ask your agent to ‘book you a vacation’, it will break down the plan into smaller chunks like ‘search flights’, ‘compare hotels’, and ‘finalize the itinerary’.

In more advanced agents, planning can involve decision trees, prioritization strategies, or even the use of dedicated planning tools. It helps the agent reason about the future and make informed choices about what to do next, rather than just reacting to each prompt in isolation.

  • Tool Use

Tool use is like giving your agent access to a toolbox. Need to do some math? It can use a calculator. Need to search the web? It can query a search engine. Want to pull real-time data? It can call an API.

 

Here’s a guide to understanding APIs

 

Instead of being limited to what is stored in its training data, an agent with tool access can tap into external resources and take actions in the real world. It enables these agents to handle much more complex, dynamic tasks than a standard LLM.

  • Role Specialization

This works mostly in a multi-agent system where agents start dividing tasks into specialized roles. For instance, a typical multi-agent system has:

  • A researcher agent that finds information
  • A planner agent that decides on the steps to take
  • An executor agent that performs each step

Even within a single agent, role specialization can help break up internal functions, making the agent more organized and efficient. This improves scalability and makes it easier to track each stage of a task. It is particularly useful in complex workflows.

 

Common Architectural Patterns for AI Agents

 

Common Architectural Patterns

Different agent architectures offer different strengths, and the right choice depends on the task you’re trying to solve. Let’s break down four of the most common patterns you will come across:

Router-Tool Pattern

In this setup, the agent listens to the task, figures out what is needed, and sends it to the right tool. Whether it is translating text, fetching data, or generating a chart, the agent does not do the work itself. It just knows which tool to call and when. This makes it super lightweight, modular, and ideal for workflows that need multiple specialized tools.

ReAct Pattern (Reason + Act)

The ReAct pattern enables an agent to alternate between thinking and acting, step by step. The agent observes, reasons about what to do next, takes an action, and then re-evaluates based on what happened. This loop helps the agent stay adaptable in real time, especially in unpredictable or complex environments where fixed plans can’t work.

Hierarchical Pattern

Hierarchical pattern resembles a company structure: a top-level agent breaks a big task into smaller ones and hands them off to lower-level agents. Each agent has its own role and responsibility, making the system modular and easy to scale. Thus, it is useful for complex tasks that involve multiple stages or specialized skills.

Swarm-Based Pattern

Swarm-based architectures rely on lots of simple agents working in parallel without a central leader. Each agent does its own thing, but together they move toward a shared goal. This makes the system highly scalable, robust, and great for solving problems like simulations, search, or distributed decision-making.

These foundational ideas – what agents are, how they work, and how they are architected – set the stage for everything else in the world of agentic AI. Understanding them is the first step toward building more capable systems that go beyond just generating answers.

Curious to see how all these pieces come together in practice? Part 1 of the webinar series, in partnership with Arize AI, walks you through real-world examples, design patterns, and live demos that bring these concepts to life. Whether you are just starting to explore AI agents or looking to improve the ones you are already building, this session is for you.

 

community series with Arize AI - part 1

 

Part 2: How Do You Evaluate Agents?

Now that we understand how an AI agent is different from a standard model, we must explore the way these features impact the evaluation of these agentic models. In Part 2 of our series with Arize AI, we will cover these conversations on transitioning evaluation techniques in detail.

Traditional metrics like BLEU and ROUGE are designed for static tasks that involve a single prompt and output. Agentic systems, however, operate like workflows or decision trees that can reason, act, observe, and repeat. There are unique challenges associated when evaluating such agents.

 

You can also read in detail about LLM evaluation and its importance

 

Some key challenges to evaluating AI agents include:

  • Planning is more than one step.

Agents usually break a big task into a series of smaller steps, making evaluation tricky. Do you judge them based on each step, the final result, or the overall strategy? A smart plan can still fail in execution, and sometimes a sloppy plan gets lucky. Hence, you must also evaluate how the agent reasons, and not just the outcome.

  • Tool use adds a layer of complexity.

Many agents rely on external tools like APIs or search engines to complete tasks. In addition to internal logic, their performance also depends on how well they choose and use these tools. It makes their behavior more dynamic and sometimes unpredictable.

  • They can adapt on the fly.

Unlike a static model, agents often change course based on what is happening in real time. Two runs of the same task might look totally different, and both could still be valid approaches. Given all these complexities of agent behavior, we need more thoughtful ways to evaluate how well they are actually performing.

Core Evaluation Techniques for AI Agents

As we move the conversation beyond evaluation challenges, let’s explore some key evaluation techniques that can work well for agentic systems.

Code-Based Evaluations

Sometimes, the best way to evaluate an agent is by observing what it does, not just what it says. Code-based evaluations involve checking how well the agent executes a task through logs, outputs, and interactions with tools or APIs. These tests are useful to validate multi-step processes or sequences that go beyond simple responses.

LLM-Driven Assessments

You can also use language models to evaluate agents. And yes, it means you are using agents to judge agents! These assessments involve prompting a separate model (or even the same one in eval mode) to review the agent’s output and reasoning. It is fast, scalable, and helpful for subjective qualities like coherence, helpfulness, or reasoning.

 

LLM bootcamp banner

 

Human Feedback and Labeling

This involves human evaluators who can catch subtle issues that models might miss, like whether an agent’s plan makes sense, if it used tools appropriately, or if the overall result feels useful. While slower and more resource-intensive, this method brings a lot of depth to the evaluation process.

Ground Truth Comparisons

This works when there is a clear correct answer since you can directly compare the agent’s output against a ground truth. This is the most straightforward form of evaluation, but it only works when there is a fixed ‘right’ answer to check against.

Thus, evaluating AI agents is not just about checking if the final answer is ‘right’ or ‘wrong.’ These systems are dynamic, interactive, and often unpredictable, so we must evaluate how they think, what they do, and why they made the choices they did.

 

Learn about Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for AI applications

 

While each technique offers valuable insights, no single method is enough on its own. Choosing the right evaluation approach often depends on the task. You can begin by answering questions like:

  • Is there a clear, correct answer? Ground truth comparisons work well.
  • Is the reasoning or planning complex? You might need LLM or human review.
  • Does the agent use tools or external APIs? Code-level inspection is key.
  • Do you care about adaptability and decision-making? Consider combining methods for a more holistic view.

As agents grow more capable, our evaluation methods must evolve too. If you want to understand how to truly measure agent performance, Part 2 of the series, partnered with Arize AI, walks through all of these ideas in more detail.

 

community series with Arize AI - part 2

 

Part 3: Can Agents Evaluate Themselves?

In Part 3 of this webinar series with Arize AI, we look at a deeper side of agent evaluation. It is not just about what the agent says but also about how it gets there. With tasks becoming increasingly complex, we need to understand their reasoning, not just their answers.

Evaluating the reasoning path allows us to trace the logic behind each action, understand decision-making quality, and detect where things might go wrong. Did the agent follow a coherent plan? Did it retrieve the right context or use the best tool for the job? These insights reveal far more than a simple pass/fail output ever could.

Advanced Evaluation Techniques

To understand how an agent thinks, we need to look beyond just the final output. Hence, we need to rely on advanced evaluation techniques. These help us dig deeper into the agent’s decision-making process and see how well it handles each step of a task.

Below are some common techniques to evaluate reasoning:

Path-Based Reasoning Analysis

Path-based reasoning analysis helps us understand the steps an agent takes to complete a task. Instead of just looking at the final answer, it follows the full chain of thought. This might include the agent’s planning, the tools it used, the information it retrieved, and how each step led to the next.

This is important because agents can sometimes land on the right answer for the wrong reasons. Maybe they guessed, or followed an unrelated path that just happened to work out. By analyzing the path, we can see whether the reasoning was solid or needs improvement. It also helps debug errors more easily since we can pinpoint exactly where things went off track.

Convergence Measurement

Convergence measurement is all about tracking progress. It figures out if the agent is getting closer to solving the problem or just spinning in circles. As the agent works step by step, we want to see signs that it is narrowing in on the goal. This is especially useful for multi-step or open-ended tasks.

It shows whether the agent is truly making progress or getting lost along the way. If the agent keeps making similar mistakes or bouncing between unrelated ideas, convergence measurement helps catch that early. It is a great way to assess focus and direction.

Planning Quality Assessment

Before agents act, many of them generate a plan. Planning quality assessment looks at how good that plan actually is. Is it clear? Does it break the task into manageable steps? Does it show a logical structure? A good plan gives the agent a strong foundation to work from and increases the chances of success.

This method is helpful when agents are handling complex or unfamiliar tasks. Poor planning often leads to confusion, delays, or wrong results. If the agent has a solid plan but still fails, we can look at execution. But if the plan itself is weak, that tells us where to focus our improvements.

Together, these methods give us a more complete picture of an agent’s thinking process. They help us go beyond accuracy and understand how well the agent is reasoning.

 

Explore a hands-on curriculum that helps you build custom LLM applications!

 

Agent-as-Judge Paradigm

As agents become more advanced, they are starting to judge how well those tasks are done. This idea is known as the Agent-as-Judge Paradigm. It means agents can evaluate their own work or the work of other agents, much like a human reviewer would.

Let’s take a deeper look at the agent-as-judge paradigm:

Self-Evaluation and Peer Review

In self-evaluation, an agent takes a step back and reviews its own reasoning or output. It might ask: Did I follow the right steps? Did I miss anything? Was my answer clear and accurate? This reflection helps the agent learn from its own mistakes and improve over time.

Peer review works a little differently. Here, one agent reviews the work of another. It might give feedback, point out errors, or suggest better approaches. This kind of agent-to-agent feedback creates a system where multiple agents can help each other grow and perform better.

Critiquing and Improving Together

When agents critique each other, they are not just pointing out what went wrong, but also offering ways to improve. This back-and-forth exchange helps strengthen their reasoning, decision-making, and planning. Over time, it leads to more reliable and effective agents.

These critiques can be simple or complex. An agent might flag a weak argument, suggest a better tool, or recommend a clearer explanation. When executed well, this process boosts overall quality and encourages teamwork, even in fully automated systems.

Feedback Loops and Internal Tools

To support this, agents need tools that help them give and receive feedback. These can include rating systems, critique templates, or reasoning checklists. Some systems even build in internal feedback loops, where agents automatically reflect on their outputs before moving on.

 

Here’s a comparison of RLHF and DPO in fine-tuning LLMs

 

These tools make self-review and peer evaluation more structured and useful. They create space for reflection, correction, and learning, without the need for human involvement every time.

Thus, as agents grow more capable, evaluating how they think becomes just as important as what they produce. From tracing reasoning paths to building internal feedback loops, these techniques give us deeper insights into agent behavior, planning, and collaboration.

In Part 3 of this series, we dive into all of this in more detail, showing how modern agents can reflect, critique, and improve not just individually, but as part of a smarter system. Explore the last part of our series if you want to see how self-aware agents are changing the game.

 

community series with Arize AI - part 3

 

Wrapping It Up: The Future of AI Agents Starts Now

AI agents are evolving, from being task-driven systems to ones capable of deep reasoning, collaboration, and even self-evaluation. This rapid technological advancement also raises the need for more sophisticated ways to measure and improve agent performance.

If you are excited about the possibilities of these smart systems and want to dive deeper, do not miss out on our webinar series in partnership with Arize AI. With real-world examples, live demos, and valuable insights, we will help you build better agents. Explore the series now and take your understanding of agentic AI to the next level!

 

community series with Arize AI

April 23, 2025

Related Topics

Statistics
Resources
rag
Programming
Machine Learning
LLM
Generative AI
Data Visualization
Data Security
Data Science
Data Engineering
Data Analytics
Computer Vision
Career
AI
Data Science Dojo | data science for everyone

Discover more from Data Science Dojo

Subscribe to get the latest updates on AI, Data Science, LLMs, and Machine Learning.